Legal Opinion

Hibbard v. Eastman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 15, 1867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This is a bill in equity, and the hearing is on a demurrer to the bill. The pleadings are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBellows, J.

The substance of the statements in the bill is, that the defendant, Eastman, having, on the fifteenth day of February, 1866, brought a suit against the complainant upon his three promissory notes of $50 each, secured by a mortgage of a tract of land, the parties met on the next day and made an agreement which was reduced to writing and signed by said Eastman, by which he agreed that if the complainant should, between that time and the next Monday night, bring him George W. Mann’s note for $85, payable in six months, he would discharge the complainant from any farther liability on account of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Jackson v. StackhouseNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  3. Smith v. LowryNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  4. Foster v. WoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  5. Couch v. MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1839

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Falcon B. L. Assn. v. SchwartzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API