Lewis v. Markle
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from. Mills District Court. Actions iu equity to cancel certain conveyances from the intervenor to the defendants, and to quiet in plaintiff' the title to the real estate included therein. The intervenor alleged in his petition that the conveyance under which plaintiff claimed the property was obtained by fraud, and he prayed that the same be canceled and set aside.
Read the full summary
Appeal from. Mills District Court. Actions iu equity to cancel certain conveyances from the intervenor to the defendants, and to quiet in plaintiff' the title to the real estate included therein. The intervenor alleged in his petition that the conveyance under which plaintiff claimed the property was obtained by fraud, and he prayed that the same be canceled and set aside. The district court entered judgment dismissing the intervenor’s petition, and granting to plaintiff the relief demanded in his petition. Defendant and intervenor appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
1. Practice on Appeal: amendment of judge’s certificate: time. The judgments in these causes were entered on the third day of October, 1885. On that day the trial judge signed a certificate to the effect that the trans- ° cript contained all the evidence introduced on * ^ie °^' causes) together with the objections of the parties to the introduction of evidence, the rulings of the court thereon, and the exceptions of the parties thereto. This certificate was subsequently amended by adding thereto a statement that the transcript contained, also, all the evidence offered by the parties on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Taylor & Co. v. KierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Pearson v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
3Cited by1 opinion
- Runge v. HahnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888