Legal Opinion

People v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.

The question presented concerns the scope of section 335 of the Sanitary Code of the City of New York. Defendant has been convicted of violating that section, which provides, inter alia, that a beauty parlor may not be operated without a permit.

It is undisputed that on February 14, 1938, defendant had on the front of a one-family house, in a residence zone in Brooklyn, a sign indicating electrolysis was available to patrons, and that she used therefor a room in that house, without having a permit to *486operate a beauty parlor. She had applied for a permit but her application was denied because…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. People v. LehrmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Garrison v. ReeveSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. People v. LehrmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. People v. Stiegler, New York County Courts1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baffoni v. State, Department of HealthSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  2. People v. MarcusCity of New York Municipal Court · 1989
  3. Baffoni v. State, Department of HealthSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API