Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Settle

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1924No. Docket No. 4319PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

This action was commenced by Henry Stieglitz, now deceased, to recover his commissions as broker for services which he had rendered in the sale of certain of defendant’s land. After the death of Mr. Stieglitz the present plaintiffs as executors of his estate were substituted as plaintiffs. The present appeal is from the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff after the third trial of the action.

At the first trial the court granted a nonsuit upon the ground that “the plaintiff has failed to prove a sufficient case for the jury, and the evidence introduced was insufficient to support a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stieglitz v. SettleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Stieglitz v. SettleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Olson v. LangerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API