Legal Opinion

Anisansel v. Coggeshall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Arthur Anisansel, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant; Josephine IT. Coggeshall, entered in the office of the clei'k of the county of New York on the 20th day of February, 1903, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, as overrules the plaintiff’s demurrer to the separate defense set forth in the 7tli paragraph of said defendant’s answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendant Josephine IT. Coggeshall owned the premises known as No. 1 East Fortieth street in the borough of Manhattan, New York. She contracted with the Jones Construction Company for doing certain plumbing work and furnishing materials incident thereto in the alteration and repair of the building upon these premises, and the agreement provided that the contractor should he paid in installments as the work progressed, the particular stages of the work, at which the several installments should become due and payable, being…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foshay v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rukeyser v. Fountain & Choate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  2. Dempsey v. Mount Sinai HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Upton Co. v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Outcault v. BonheurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Glatt v. Meade, New York County Courts1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API