Legal Opinion
United States v. 67.59 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Huntingdon County
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 26, 1976No. Civ. 75-692PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HERMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court in this case is a motion filed by the United States seeking to strike the defenses set forth in defendant Morningstar’s amended answer as insufficient pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). The motion filed by the United States will be granted for the reasons which follow.
This case arises as the result of condemnation proceedings instituted by the Secretary of the Army for the construction of a flood control reservoir, known as the Rays-town Lake Project, on the Juniata River, Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania. In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. 416.81 Acres of Land, Etc., and Mercantile National Bank of Indiana, as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. 64.88 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and Charles F. ChubbCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tennessee Gas Pipeline v. 104 Acres in Prov. Cty.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1990
- Midkiff v. TomDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1979
- United States v. 18.67 Acres of LandDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992