Legal Opinion

Claim of Deas v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board reinstated.

Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 (3) (c) (since amended with minor changes and renumbered as Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 [3] [d]) provides that an employer or insurer that fails to make timely payment of a workers’ compensation award must pay a penalty "to the injured worker or his or her dependents.” A penalty was assessed against respondent State Insurance Fund for not timely reimbursing the Housing Authority even though the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. De Mayo v. Rensselaer Polytech InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Claim of Keser v. New York State Elmira Psychiatric CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Hamilton v. PurserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. In re the Claim of Keser v. New York State Elmira Psychiatric CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API