Legal Opinion

Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. James

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1893No. 223PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. At Law. Action by Granville J. James against the Union Pacific Railway Company for personal injuries. Verdict and judgment were given for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, District Judge.

The defendant in error, while in the employ of the Union Pacific Railway Company as a brakeman, sustained an injury to his left foot and leg which necessitated amputation, in consequence of which injury he brought an action against the railway company in the circuit court for the southern district of Iowa, and recovered a verdict in the sum of $7,500. The material allegations contained in his petition or complaint were as follows: That in the discharge of his duty as a hrakeman on one of the defend*1002ant’s freight trains he was required to assist in switching some freight…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ford v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Greenleaf v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Village of Jefferson v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sabine Towing Co. v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. Schmidt v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Yelloway, Inc. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Henwood v. CoburnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  5. Malkmus v. St. Louis Portland Cement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API