Legal Opinion

Akter v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 16, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-3256Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FATEMA AKTER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-03256 (TNM) MARCO RUBIO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff asks the Court to compel the Department of State and various federal officials to schedule her visa interview. Essentially: Her petition for an alien relative visa waits in a chronological queue for adjudication, and she wants this Court to escort her to the front of the line. The Government moves to dismiss, arguing that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the action…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API