Legal Opinion
Harold T. Wilson v. Fairchild Republic Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 11, 1998No. 461, Docket 97-7247PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question of whether two claims made by the plaintiff are timely. According to the defendant, these claims were first made in a brief filed some two and one-half years after plaintiffs last amendment to his complaint. Under the applicable statute of limitations, these claims would be timely only if they could be set forth in an amended pleading that would relate back to the original complaint. We agree with United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Raymond J. Dearie, Judge) that one of these was untimely, because it was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Geneva Butts v. The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Joseph Fama v. Commissioner of Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Glover v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Francis v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Gerard O'Hara and Lisa O'Hara v. Weeks Marine, Inc. And Collazo Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Nettis v. LevittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.