Legal Opinion

Thurston v. Buxton, Administratrix

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1941No. 27,566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.

William J. Buxton died testate. By the terms of his last will and testament his estate was bequeathed to four legatees, subject to a life estate in favor of his widow. One of the legatees was William A. Buxton, a son of the testator. After the death of his father, and during the lifetime of the widow, William A. Buxton borrowed $750 from Arthur J. Thurston, executing therefor a promissory note and an assignment of his1 interest in his father’s estate. The operative part of the assignment was as follows:

“Now therefore, I, Arthur Buxton (William A. Buxton), do hereby sell, assign and set over a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reilly v. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  2. Lawrence v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Ryker v. VawterIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Evans v. PenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Mayer v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deetz v. McGowanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Estate of Lammerts v. Heritage Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API