Legal Opinion

Pargo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 2006No. 27377PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.

Appellant Cortez D. Pargo (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his amended motion to vacate, set aside or correct judgment and sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 In his sole point on appeal, Mov-ant maintains the motion court erred in denying his 24.035 motion “because the guilty plea record failed to establish a sufficient factual basis for second degree robbery ...,” thus, violating Movant’s “rights under Rules 24.02 and 24.035 and to due process of law, under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. State v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Hoskin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Nichols v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Jenkins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pradt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Dobbs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Harris v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Nelson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. PAUL SHEARIN v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API