Legal Opinion

Hollander & Hollander v. Kamenjarin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 31, 1990No. 1-88-3417PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE DiVITO

delivered the opinion of the court:

Hollander and Hollander (Hollander), a law firm and a judgment creditor of Nicholas Kamenjarin, filed an action against the Illinois Department of Revenue (the Department) to garnish certain money allegedly due Kamenjarin from the Department. The circuit court entered judgment against the Department for $3,114.38. In this appeal, the Department maintains that under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to hear this case, which involved an agency of the State of Illinois.

Having obtained a judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Senn Park Nursing Center v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sass v. KramerIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Herget National Bank of Pekin v. KenneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Henderson v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. First Finance Co. v. PellumIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lavery v. Department of Financial and Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2025
  3. People v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API