Legal Opinion

Smith v. Connor

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1959No. 6430PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Appellees Virginia Smith Connor and Lawrence J. Smith (hereinafter called Virginia and Lawrence) brought this action in the Superior Court for Maricopa County against their brother, Emmet Smith (hereinafter called Emmet), asking that a constructive trust be imposed upon certain fees and leaseholds held by Emmet. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the appellees, established the trust, and ordered that Virginia and Lawrence each be vested with an undivided one-third interest in the property. The trial court also decreed that Emmet make an accounting for the period…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Pattison v. PattisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Murillo v. HernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Bremer v. BremerIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. King v. UhlmannArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Fernandez v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Smith v. RabbArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Matter of WeinerArizona Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API