Legal Opinion
Piacentini v. Mineola Union Free School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 16, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Roger Piacentini appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated March 9, 2000, which denied his motion, in effect, for reargument.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The appellant’s motion, characterized as one for reargument and renewal, was in actuality a motion for leave to reargue because it was not based upon new facts which were unavailable at the time of the original motion (see, McCorvey v Schoulder, 273 AD2d 207; Daly v Messina, 267 AD2d 345; Lupoli v Venus Labs.,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DeFreitas v. Board of Education of City of Mount Vernon District No. 416Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Bossio v. FiorilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Lupoli v. Venus Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Schumer v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- McCorvey v. SchoulderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. PeraltaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Sabatini v. Incorporated Village of KensingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Levins v. BoyarskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Gadsden v. MontesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003