Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Musil

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided January 31, 1994No. 92-4489-CV-C-5PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SCOTT O. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Assessment of Prejudgment Interest. Plaintiffs request the Court to award prejudgment interest pursuant to Mo.Rev.Stat. § 408.040.2 (1987). Defendant argues that interest should not be assessed for two reasons: (1) plaintiffs’ Complaint did not plead facts sufficient to authorize the award of interest, and (2) plaintiffs’ settlement offers were ambiguous.

I.FACTS

Plaintiffs Belevia A. Gibson and Arthur S. Gibson IV asserted three claims against defendant. Each filed personal injury claims and both asserted a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hazen v. PasleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Dierker Associates, D.C., P.C. v. GillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Holtmeier v. DayaniMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. General Aggregate Corp. v. LaBrayereMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Call v. HeardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Brown v. DonhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Werremeyer v. KC Auto Salvage Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  4. Jones v. Mann (In Re Jones)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2001
  5. Call v. HeardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API