Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 27, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was indicted and convicted for the possession of a forged instrument. Section 13A-9-6, Alabama Code 1975 (Amended 1977). Sentence was six years' imprisonment

Admitted in this case were the very same type of mug shots this Court condemned in Holsclaw v. State, 364 So.2d 378 (Ala.Cr.App.) cert. denied, 364 So.2d 382 (Ala. 1978). These photographs should not have been admitted into evidence, over proper objection, because they indicated that the defendant had a criminal record However, at trial, this was not the basis of defense counsel's objection. The objection made at trial was:

"I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  2. Holsclaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Howell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Ex Parte WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API