People v. Di Carlo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The issue as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant of the crime charged was a very narrow one. Upon that issue the defendant was entitled to a fair trial uninfluenced by any extraneous circumstances. We think the defendant was denied that right. Repeatedly during the progress of the trial there occurred acrimonious arguments between the judge presiding and the counsel for the defendant. The strictures repeatedly placed upon counsel for the defendant during the progress of the trial, while, undoubtedly, induced, to a large degree, by the disrespectful conduct of counsel, in our opinion…
2Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Buckley v. 2570 Broadway Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- People v. SepulvedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Morris Cohon & Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.