Muddy Boys, Inc. v. Dep't of Commerce
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Judge:
¶1 In this case, we are asked to decide whether a contractor who successfully defends itself in an administrative enforcement action brought against it by the Utah Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing (DOPL) may as the "prevailing party" recover attorney fees and costs from DOPL. See Utah Code Ann. § 58-55-503 (5)(d) (LexisNexis 2016). In administrative decisions, DOPL and the Department of Commerce (the Department) each interpreted the governing statute as forbidding such fee awards. Muddy Boys, Inc. (Muddy Boys) challenges those decisions and, although we…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Narey v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- State v. RasaboutUtah Supreme Court · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Erda Community Assn v. GrantsvilleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- State v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Bevan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Nielsen v. Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Mayhew v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.