Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Bruce

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1937No. 32481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellant averred by his petition in mandamus that he is the owner of seven bonds, each for the principal sum of five hundred dollars of the Teoo Sub-Drainage District, and that the said bonds were past due both in principal and interest. Copies thereof were exhibited with the petition. Appellees are the commissioners of said district and the treasurer thereof. The petition avers that although the bonds and the interest thereon are in default, and “although earnest and constant demand has been made upon” the commissioners to pay said bonds in default, they have failed “to see to it that an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hastings-Stout Co. v. J. L. Walker & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bullock v. Sim Ramsey, Jr. Trucking Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Teoc Sub-Drainage Dist. v. HalliwellMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API