Legal Opinion

Howard-Pinson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 18, 2006No. 06-556CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WHEELER, Judge.

This case involves the claim of Plaintiff, Robert M. Howard-Pinson, that the Government violated his constitutional rights in court-martial proceedings against him for distributing controlled substances. He contends that his confession was obtained involuntarily in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the alternative, for judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to RCFC 52.1. Plaintiff has requested oral argument regarding his due process rights under Miranda v. Arizona,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flowers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API