Legal Opinion

Commiskey v. McPike

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

'Error, to the St. Louis. Circuit Court, Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBombauer, J.

There is a conflict of authority in courts of the various states on the subject whether the receipt by the creditor from the debtor, of the note or acceptance of a third person, corresponding in amount, is prima facie evidence of the payment of the original demand. Our supreme court in the case of Appleton v. Kennon (19 Mo. 641), followed the New York rule as declared in Tobey v. Barber (5 Johns. 68), that “anote either of the debtor or of a third person, for a pre-existing debt, is no payment unless the creditor expressly agrees to take it as payment, and to run the risk of it being paid. ’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tobey v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Leabo v. GoodeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Appleton v. KennonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  4. Riggs v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kennett v. Peters & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. McEwen v. Sterling State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Selby v. McCulloughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Shotwell v. MunroeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Sturdevant Bank ex rel. Hartle v. PetermanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API