Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Zupancic

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1991No. 90-1615PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The sole issue before the court is whether the construction of for-profit, multiunit rental housing constitutes the construction of facilities for commerce or industry under Section 13, Article VIII, Ohio Constitution. The parties agree that if the proposed housing project meets the requirements of Section 13, the issuance of the bonds will meet constitutional muster, and the respondent auditor will be obligated to sign the bonds and affix his seal to them. For the reasons set forth below, we overrule State, ex rel. Brown, v. Beard (1976), 48 Ohio St.2d 290, 2 O.O.3d 438, 358 N.E.2d 569, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Scott v. News-HeraldOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Roosevelt Properties Co. v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. BeardOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. County of Stark v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. Burton, 06ap-690 (4-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. CarswellOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Cleveland v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. OliverOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API