Legal Opinion

Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co. v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided April 15, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Equity. Suit for unfair competition. On motion for preliminary injunction.'

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The question on this motion as to whether the statements in defendant’s labels that its coating for granite ironware and granite steelware is “absolutely free from any injurious ingredients” make out a case of unfair competition with complainant’s goods, which are entirely free from arsenic, lead, and antimony, requires for its answer the determination of issues of fact as to which there is conflict in the affidavits; and, even if such issues were decided in complainant’s favor, would present some hovel aspects of the law of unfair competition. So' much of the cause…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Turner & Seymour Mfg. Co. v. A. & J. MFG. CO.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Helmet Co. v. Wm. Wrigley, Jr., Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Petro Franchise Systems, LLC v. All American Properties, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Taylor v. BostickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  5. Pacific Coast Condensed Milk Co. v. Frye & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API