Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Brooks

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1965PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawsuit only injunctive relief is sought. The Chancellor granted the injunction and an appeal has been *537seasonably perfected, briefs filed, and arguments beard. Onr conclusion, after hearing arguments and studying the record, is that the Chancellor has fully answered all the questions presented and correctly decided the case. To're-write the memorandum opinion, which we find in the record of the Chancellor on the same assignments would serve no useful purpose, and we, therefore, adopt the opinion of the Chancellor as the opinion of this Court.

"We will merely supplement that opinion by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. PerkinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Vandergriff v. State Ex Rel. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Broyles v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In re Subpoena to appear Issued for KelleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Industrial Development Board of Tullahoma v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Hoffman v. WilkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. State ex rel. Leech v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  4. The Commissioners of the Powell-Clinch Utility District v. Utility Management Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  5. State ex rel. Thompson v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API