Legal Opinion

Southern Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Navy Knitting Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1919Published

1Opinion of the Court

The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, but without costs. There is nothing in the amendment to section 798 of the Code of Civil Procedure in 1910 that impaired the effect of Schlesinger v. Borough Bank (112 App. Div. 121) and Schlegel v. Church of Holy Trinity (194 N. Y. 391). The Schlegel ease was decided for the very purpose of settling the practice,, and the practice should not now be unsettled. The party who serves a pleading by mail thereby gives his opponent, under section 798 of the Code of Civil Procedure, three days’ additional time…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. Borough BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Schlegel v. Roman Catholic Church of the Most Holy TrinityNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API