Incorporated Town of Ackley v. Central States Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.
The plaintiff is a municipality under the laws of Iowa. Defendant R. R. Hadley operates a creamery plant within the corporate limits of the said town, and uses electricity as motive power therein. He had been purchasing electrical energy front the' municipal plant owned by plaintiff for some years] but found it unsatisfactory and expensive, and at times the current was insufficient for his needs. ' This municipal' plant was what is known as a “direct current” system, and had been in usé for many years.
"' The' Céñtral B-tátes Electric Company, codefendant, is a public utility, furnishing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wheeler v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Jones v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
- Hume v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Bliven v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Reimer's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Adams v. Commissioners of TrappeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Miller v. Incorporated Town of MilfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- West Texas Utilities Company v. City of BairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.