Legal Opinion · Dissent

Daniel v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 20, 2019No. 18-460Relating-toCited by 3 opinions

1DissentJustice Thomas

Petitioner Walter Daniel filed this tort suit against the United States after his wife, Navy Lieutenant Rebekah Daniel, died at a naval hospital due to a complication following childbirth. The District Court determined that the suit was barred by Feres v. United States , 340 U.S. 135 , 71 S.Ct. 153 , 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950), which held that military personnel injured by the negligence of a federal employee cannot sue the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Court of Appeals "regretfully" reached the same conclusion and affirmed. 889 F.3d 978 , 980 (C.A.9 2018).

Petitioner now asks…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVriesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Lanus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Walter Daniel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ghazala Siddiqui v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. McGuire v. BeckmannDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API