Legal Opinion

Hessenius v. Schmidt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1981No. 79-981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals dated May 27, 1980, affirming an order of the circuit court for Winnebago county: LEO W. MACK, court commissioner.

The primary question presented is whether the court commissioner in a small claims proceeding erred in dismissing the defendant’s counterclaim alleging frivolous action and asking for costs and attorney’s fees pursuant to sec. 814.025, Stats. 1977, without permitting the defendant to present testimony supporting his counter claim? We hold that the court commissioner lacked jurisdiction over the counterclaim and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sommer v. CarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Kohler Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Haight v. LuciaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  4. State Ex Rel. Perry v. WolkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Sommer v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shanks v. Johnson Abstract & Title, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. LoneyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  3. Tower Special Facilities, Inc. v. Investment Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Tatum v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  5. Maddox v. Department of Human Services of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API