Legal Opinion

Hardy Dotson, Iii, and Employers Insurance of Wausau, Intervenor-Appellant v. Clark Equipment Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1986No. 85-4175PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

In this product liability case, appellant Hardy Dotson appeals the district court’s judgment n.o.v. entered after the jury had found appellee Clark Equipment Co. liable for Dotson’s injury. Because substantial evidence in support of the jury verdict exists, the district court erred in granting Clark Equipment’s motion. We therefore reverse the judgment n.o.v. and remand to the district court for a decision on Clark Equipment’s accompanying motion for new trial.

Working for a Louisiana roofing manufacturing company, Dotson operated a Clark forklift to transport rolls of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Otis Hindman v. The City of Paris, Texas, Andrew Smith, and Charles G. WhitleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Ralston Purina Company v. Joe B. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Eyre v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hardy Dotson, III and Dorothy M. Dotson v. Clark Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Mona Miller v. Butcher DistributorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Stanford ex rel. Stanford v. Leaf River Forest Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1986
  4. Dotson v. Clark Equipment CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API