Legal Opinion

Pietro v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1929No. Appeal, 215PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Toronto and 22d Streets, in the City of Philadelphia, cross each other at right angles; the former is trackless, but the latter has two lines of trolley tracks owned by defendant, on one of which its cars travel northward, and on the other southward. The accident, out of which the present action arose, occurred on a bright clear day at the intersection of those streets, at a time when trolley cars, trucks and other vehicles using the streets could be seen for a long distance.

In considering whether or not the trial judge erred in not giving binding instructions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Yardley v. CuthbertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  3. Baxter v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Dempsey v. City of ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. McLane v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Bell v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Offensend v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Serhan v. BestederSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Bowles v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API