Legal Opinion

Walker v. Scott

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the Court

Jones, Oliver B., J.

This was an action below to compel the specific performance of a contract for the purchase of real estate. Defendant refused to accept a deed and pay the purchase price, contending that the title of plaintiff to the property was “defective, unmarketable and not good.”

On careful consideration of the pleadings there appears to be no issue raised between the parties on the facts, and they seem to agree in all matters as to the state of the records relating to plaintiff’s title, and to differ only as to the law and the legal effect of these records.

A demurrer to the reply was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Young v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vieland v. First Federal Savings Bank (In Re Vieland)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  2. Stone v. Equitable Mortgage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. Charles SenkeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Charles SenkeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API