Legal Opinion

State v. Burciaga

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 29, 1985No. 1 CA-CR 8193PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

CORCORAN, Judge.

The state appeals pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-4032(7) from the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion to suppress statements made by the defendant in connection with the preparation of a presentence report in a prior unrelated case.

The issues presented are:(1) Whether rule 26.6(d)(2), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, precludes statements made by defendant during preparation of a presentence report in one case from being admitted at the trial in a later unrelated case; and(2) Whether defendant’s prior conviction for theft is admissible in the state’s case in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. VallejosArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. RomeroArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. State v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. State v. BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. State of Arizona v. Analysya ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API