Legal Opinion
Pino v. United States
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 1, 2008No. 105,223PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
T1 The United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Cireuit, certified the following question under the authority of Tenth Cireuit Rule 27.1 and the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 0.8.2001, § 1601-1611.
As of September 1-2, 20083, did the Oklahoma Wrongful Death Statute, Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1058, afford a cause of action for the wrongful death of a nonviable stillborn fetus? 1
I. FEDERAL LITIGATION
T2 On December 19, 2005, the plaintiffs, Michael Pino and Amy Pino, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma both individually…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Porter v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Bonbrest v. KotzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carranza v. United StatesUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. KunzWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- MacK v. Carmack, 1091040 (Ala. 9-9-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- K-Mart Corp. v. HerringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Hamilton v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012