Leaustin Barnett v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.
The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for first degree murder with a firearm and robbery with a firearm. He argues the trial court committed fundamental error in allowing Williams 1 rule evidence to become a feature of the trial, particularly in the State’s closing argument. We disagree and affirm.
The information charged the defendant with first degree murder with a firearm while wearing a mask and robbery with a firearm. The State filed a notice of intent to introduce Williams rule evidence. The notice advised that the State intended to introduce evidence of a subsequent shooting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Conahan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- State v. CalvertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Grier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
3Cited by3 opinions
- DARNELL RAZZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- HENRY LEE JONES, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- Jermaine Henderson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026