Legal Opinion

Leaustin Barnett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 2014No. 4D12-2533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for first degree murder with a firearm and robbery with a firearm. He argues the trial court committed fundamental error in allowing Williams 1 rule evidence to become a feature of the trial, particularly in the State’s closing argument. We disagree and affirm.

The information charged the defendant with first degree murder with a firearm while wearing a mask and robbery with a firearm. The State filed a notice of intent to introduce Williams rule evidence. The notice advised that the State intended to introduce evidence of a subsequent shooting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Conahan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. State v. CalvertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Grier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DARNELL RAZZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. HENRY LEE JONES, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  3. Jermaine Henderson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API