Legal Opinion

State v. Gee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The defendant, David L. Gee, was indicted for knowingly uttering and publishing a certain forged and counterfeit writing, in form and similitude of the certificate described in the indictment.

Read the full summary

The defendant, David L. Gee, was indicted for knowingly uttering and publishing a certain forged and counterfeit writing, in form and similitude of the certificate described in the indictment. It is charged, in substance, that pursuant to section 4085 of Hill’s Oode, as amended by the act of February twentieth, eighteen hundred and ninety-three (Session Laws, 1893, p. 60), the County Court of Multnomah County, on January seventeenth, eighteen hundred and ninety-four, levied a tax of one mill upon all taxable property within the county, which was collected and kept as a separate fund, known as…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Wolverton.

The only theory upon which this case can proceed is that the law has provided for an official certificate or return of a road supervisor, which may be received by the county court as legal evidence of the facts certified to, and has further prescribed a penalty for forging or counterfeiting the same, and for uttering such certificate so forged or counterfeited with intent to defraud. The indictment is drawn under section 1808, Hill’s Code of Oregon which provides that “If any person shall, with intent to injure or defraud any one, falsely make, alter, forge, or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. People v. HarrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  4. People v. BibbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. LorenzenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Nelson v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  3. Darling v. PurcellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Dreeben v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API