Legal Opinion

Carey Rodriguez Greenberg & Paul, LLP v. Arminak

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 28, 2008No. Case 08-21557-MCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OMNIBUS ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD, DENYING MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD, HOLDING PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO COSTS AND INTEREST

JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs (“CRGP”) Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award (D.E. # 1), filed May 30, 2008. On August 25, 2008, the Defendants (collectively referred to herein as “Arminak”) filed their Opposition to the Petitioner’s Request to Confirm the Arbitration Award (D.E. # 13). 1 On September 2, 2008, CRGP filed a Reply Brief in Support of Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. James v. Gulf Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Transport Rental Systems, Inc. v. Hertz CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Fairways Royale Ass'n, Inc. v. Hasam Realty Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. MullenaxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  2. Kilgore v. MullenaxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Structures USA, LLC v. CHM Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API