Legal Opinion

Howard v. National Educ. Ass'n of New York

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided September 9, 1997No. 1:94-cr-00214PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER

McAVOY, Chief Judge.

This ease concerns a dispute over benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Specifically, the dispute involves the construction of the term “accidental” in an accidental death insurance policy and arises from the death of Plaintiffs husband^ Defendant Hartford Life Insurance Company (“Hartford Life”) declined to pay the policy’s benefits after concluding that the death was not accidental.

Plaintiff Carole Howard originally filed this action in New York State Supreme Court, Broome County, but…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Richard H. Heasley, Sr. And Doris G. Heasley v. Belden & Blake CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dolores K. Jones v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, General Motors, and General Motors Life and Disability Benefits ProgramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. West v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
  3. Kolowski v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  4. Erbe v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Carson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API