Sudhoff v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant rehearing, withdraw our earlier opinion and issue the following opinion in its stead.
Eva Marie Sudhoff (“Mrs. Sudhoff’) appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motions to intervene and set aside the judicial sale of her marital home. She argues that the judgment of foreclosure was void because she was not made a party to the suit and received no notice of the proceedings. Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) responds that her motions were untimely and that she was not a necessary party to the suit *427because she did not sign the note and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Alger v. PetersSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Hertz Corp. v. PiccoloSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Indian River Farms v. YBF PARTNERSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- John Stepp, Inc. v. FIRST FED S. & L. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sudhoff v. FEDERAL NAT. MORTG. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006