Legal Opinion

State v. Doren

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 2002No. C6-02-58PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appellant Elliot Doren contests the district court’s pretrial order denying his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a traffic stop by a police officer while searching Doren, a passenger. Doren contends that the officer improperly extended the duration of the stop, had no basis for conducting two searches, and lacked a valid reason for having Doren sit in the officer’s squad car during a warrants check. Because we conclude that the district court did not err in denying Doren’s suppression motion, we affirm.

FACTS

At about 1:15 in the morning of March…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
  2. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOSUE A. CARRILLO (17-02-0316, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
  3. State of Minnesota v. Nathan John ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State of Minnesota v. SerShawn Copone NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API