State v. Doren
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.
Appellant Elliot Doren contests the district court’s pretrial order denying his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a traffic stop by a police officer while searching Doren, a passenger. Doren contends that the officer improperly extended the duration of the stop, had no basis for conducting two searches, and lacked a valid reason for having Doren sit in the officer’s squad car during a warrants check. Because we conclude that the district court did not err in denying Doren’s suppression motion, we affirm.
FACTS
At about 1:15 in the morning of March…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dunn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOSUE A. CARRILLO (17-02-0316, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
- State of Minnesota v. Nathan John ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. SerShawn Copone NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015