Legal Opinion · Dissent

Enloe v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 30, 2001No. A01A1106Published

1DissentBlackburn, Chief Judge

Because the State narrowly indicted Enloe for committing child molestation by a specific touching of the victim’s penis in this case, Enloe’s conviction should be reversed, and I must respectfully dissent from the conclusions reached by the majority.

To support a conviction, the evidence must meet the standards set forth in Jackson v. Virginia.1 After approval of a jury verdict by the trial court, the judgment entered thereon will not be disturbed on appeal if supported by any evidence, in the absence of any material error of law. Horan v. Pirkle.2

Applying this standard, the evidence shows…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Buice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Strickland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Perguson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API