Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cogar v. Kidd

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1977No. 13851PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Justice:

This is an original action in prohibition brought by a defendant under indictment for embezzlement to test the constitutionality of the embezzlement statute, W. Va. Code, 61-3-20. Petitioner’s principal claim is the statute creates an impermissible presumption of guilt, vio lating his rights under Article III, Sections 5 and 10 of the West Virginia Constitution and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. We agree, but hold that the entire embezzlement statute is not thereby rendered unconstitutional.

The theory urged by the petitioner is the same…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Peacher v. SencindiverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. BoydWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wanstreet v. BordenkircherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Barker v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. RichardsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Whitman v. FoxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API