Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 2006No. A04A1375PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

In Solomon v. Barnett, 269 Ga. App. 779 (605 SE2d 599) (2004), we determined that the trial court correctly concluded that William Solomon d/b/a Graphic Engineering, plaintiff below, dealt with W. Harry Barnett not in Barnett’s personal capacity, but only through Barnett’s corporate entities, and that the corporations’ reinstatements were retroactive as a matter of law.

Pursuant to grant of certiorari, the Supreme Court remanded the case to this Court “for its resolution of [Solomon’s] equitable estoppel argument, which was properly before that Court. State v. Tye, 276…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eiberger v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Tinsley v. RiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Hughes v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. State v. TyeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  5. Tune v. BeelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Solomon v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Solomon v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API