Legal Opinion

Van Pelt, Exr. v. King

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMauck, P. J.

Bert Van Pelt, as executor of Edwin Gr. Cox, brought his action to recover on two promissory notes made and delivered to the testator by Frank L. King and Mildred King. The defendants answered that “said Edwin Gr. Cox, being sick of chronic diarrhea, almost blind, and upwards of 82 years of age, having made arrangements to go to a hospital for medical treatment for said malady, on or about the - day of July, 1922, then gave and delivered said note, together with another note, to said defendant Mildred King with these words, ‘ These notes are yours; I give them to you; I may ask you for them,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Basket v. HassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Johnson v. ColleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. WoodruffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Caple, Admr. v. CraneOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Jeffrey Steidle v. United States Liability Insurance Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API