Legal Opinion

Mastin Eugene Taylor v. Vern Faatz, Chairman of Oregon State Board of Parole

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1992No. 90-35562Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

953 F.2d 1388

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Mastin Eugene TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant

v.

Vern FAATZ, Chairman of Oregon State Board of Parole,

Respondent-Appellee

No. 90-35562.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1992.

Decided Feb. 6, 1992.

Before JAMES R. BROWNING, D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Robert Lee Norris v. Henry Risley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Cato v. RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Paul F. Jancsek, III v. Oregon Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Hogle (John Craig)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API