United States v. One Ford Truck
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
Is a motor vehicle used in the transportation of raw materials (molasses), intended for use in the operation of an illegal distillery in fraud of the revenue, subject to forfeiture under Section 33211 ■of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 3321 ?
In United States v. One Chevrolet Truck Automobile, etc., D.C., 1934, 8 F.Supp. 271, the court held that although the sugar and other materials hauled by the defendant truck were subject to forfeiture, under the provisions of R.S. Sec. 34S0 (virtually identical with the present Sec. 3321) the truck itself…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. One Ford TruckDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1932
- United States v. One Ford TruckDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Plymouth Coupe (1941) Serial Number 15051526District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- United States v. One Plymouth SedanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- United States v. One Chevrolet Loadmaster TruckDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1950