Legal Opinion

Coxe v. Downs

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Ouachita, Willson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtGarland, J.

This suit is instituted on two promissory notes, drawn by the defendant, payable to the plaintiff, for $1516 66 each, with interest from maturity. The defendant in his answer sets up various defences; among others, that the notes were given to secure the price of a tract of land purchased by him of the plaintiff, being a portion of the Maison Rouge claim, on the Ouachita river. He says that at, and previous to the time of his purchase, the agent of the plaintiff fraudulently represented to him, that he had a regular chain of conveyances from Maison Rouge to himself, and that no other claim…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. M'Donough v. CopelandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1836
  2. M'Donough v. HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. McCauslandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Thompson v. McCauslandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. Alfonso v. RuizLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Bursley v. RheamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API