Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Panetta

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1956No. Appeal, No. 63PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The appellant, Vincent Panetta, was found guilty by a jury of receiving stolen goods under Indictment No. 1016. Two other defendants, Angelo Massone and James Robert Crawford, were also indicted for receiving stolen goods under Indictment Nos. 1014 and 1013 respectively. All three defendants were also indicted for conspiracy, under Indictment No. 1018. Massone and Panetta plead not guilty as to all indictments and demanded a jury trial. Crawford plead guilty to receiving stolen goods under Indictment No. 1013 and not guilty as to the conspiracy charge. Crawford agreed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. PatskinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Commonwealth v. NeumanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Commonwealth v. De FelippisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PanettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. PanettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API