Vann v. Guildfield Missionary Baptist Church
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KISER, Senior District Judge.
Before me now is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated herein, the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED.
I.STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Plaintiff, Harold E. Vann, II (hereinafter ‘Vann”), accepted an offer to act as a minister for the Defendant, the Guild-field Missionary Baptist Church (hereinafter “Guildfield”). Vann contends that Guildfield’s by-laws contained the terms of his employment relevant to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elk Grove Unified School District v. NewdowSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bruss v. PrzybyloAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Bruss v. PrzybyloAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008