Legal Opinion

Decker v. Roes (In Re Roes)

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 31, 1983No. Civ. No. 82-2210, Bankruptcy No. 81-0854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIUNNO, Senior District Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Bankruptcy Judge determining that the funds owed by the debtor to the N.J. State Lottery Commission are not discharged and survive the bankruptcy.

The dispute arose because, although the debtor listed the Lottery Commission claim (as the claim of a creditor not entitled to priority), the notice sent out as a consequence indicated neither the interest of the Lottery Commission nor the amount of the claim. The schedule of debts disclosed items owed to more than one New Jersey agency, with the amount indicated as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. In the Matter of Harbor Tank Storage Co., Inc. Murray Oil Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Kaczynski (In Re Kaczynski)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  2. Dollinger v. Poskanzer (In Re Poskanzer)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  3. Carlton Forge Works v. Senall (In Re Senall)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API